tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7004833821877183483.post1647161089092935139..comments2024-03-28T18:37:50.710+08:00Comments on American Action Report: The Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) ConUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7004833821877183483.post-60240847775142466402011-02-06T09:14:23.023+08:002011-02-06T09:14:23.023+08:00I have searched in vain for something authoritativ...I have searched in vain for something authoritative that supports your claims. The site you cite simply makes the claim (which you repeat) and offers no substantiation.<br />I then did an Internet search, looking past the obvious suspects such as Rense and Ron Paul Forums. Eventually, I found a blog that repeats the same stuff you did. It offered convoluted verbiage intended to resemble reasoning; but, no, it didn't offer any substantiation either.<br />The Burger letter, on the other hand, is a clear facsimile of a letter written on on a single sheet bearing the Supreme Court emblem, and dated 1988.<br />I was aware of the Burger letter well before 1992, and probably closer to 1988. Burger died in 1995, having had six or seven years to publicly denounce the letter as a forgery and send someone to prison for it. That in itself is a powerful argument for the legitimacy of the letter.<br />I'm sure you know that several of the states that had initially called for a Constitutional Convention have rescinded their call.<br />Can you offer primary or secondary sources supporting your position that the Burger letter is a fraud?Paradigmaclasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08055126235952605340noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7004833821877183483.post-31662020386236126582011-02-04T00:33:32.842+08:002011-02-04T00:33:32.842+08:00The author makes two major mistakes in this post. ...The author makes two major mistakes in this post. First, he talks about the so-called Burger letter. The letter is a phoney as shown both by www.foavc.org FAQ 8.6 and by Sweet Liberty, an anti convention website. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/concon/burger.htm Note the date of the letter and Sweet Liberty has been around since 1999.<br /><br />Second the author admits 34 states have applied for a convention call. The Constitution mandates Congress must call if this happens. Yet, the author urges we overthrow the Constitution and not obey it. Given he uses questionable references and urges we overthrow the Constitution, can we really believe what this guy says?Bill Walkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03236863808490115821noreply@blogger.com