- Table of Contents
- Peaceful Non-cooperation
- Vantage Point from Asia
- Songs and Poems
- Recommended Web Sites
- Recommended Books
- In Others Words
- Israel's War on Civilization
- Realistic Dictionary
- Ebenezer Christian and the Three Christmas Spirits...
- September 11, 2001
- How Reality Works
- 2012 Elections
- Environmental and Sustainability Issues
- The Fox Fairy of Kanifay Island
Thursday, January 7, 2016
46 Tips for Recognizing a False Flag or other Psyop
“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin
There can be no doubt that false flag attacks are a reality. Washington’s Blog has documented at least 53 false flag attacks to which government officials in various countries—including the U.S.—have later admitted. Only the most cowardly, self-deceived individuals can doubt the existence of false flag attacks.
Several web sites offer anywhere from three to fifteen clues on how to recognize false flag attacks. I’ve gleaned through them and added a few of my own. There are really too many to cover in detail in a single article. Instead, I’ve chosen simply to list them and perhaps go into further detail a few at a time, on some future occasion.
In a false flag attack or other psyop, several (or many) of the following phenomena are evident:
1. There is an immediate comprehensive narrative, including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement, government agencies, and the mainstream media immediately proffer a narrative that completely explains the event and encourages citizens to tie their intellectual understanding of the tragedy to the emotions they experience.
2. The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body.
3. The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue. (e.g. calls for gun confiscation) Media and government officials promote a narrative against scapegoat groups and/or an agenda to deprive citizens of life, liberty, or property.
4.. Government begins to “take action” against the scapegoat or moves along the lines of the media narrative.
5. Military training drills and police drills occur on the day of and very near the attack itself, causing confusion to obscure eye witness testimony and allowing orchestrators to plant both patsies, disinformation and backup operatives.
6. It’s a high-profile event. According to a NewYork Times news article, mass murders (murders of four or more people at one time) occur an average of once a day in the U.S. The overwhelming majority of mass murders are ignored, but a select few are covered 24/7.
7. The event seems too theatrical to be real (or too theatrical to be taken at face value).
8.. Government or media foreknowledge (e.g. BBC announcing the collapse of WTC-7 some 20 minutes before it actually occurred).
9. Ignored warnings.
10.. Facilitated by authorities.
11. Protocol ignored. (In the Sandy Hook psyop, almost everyone in any official capacity violated the law and failed to follow required protocol.)
12. Official narrative contradicts boundary conditions (e.g., the narrative that a non-pilot such as Hani Hanjour taught himself to fly a Boeing 757 more expertly than an experienced Boeing pilot.)
13. Significant omissions in the official story (e.g., the fact that, only two weeks before 9/11, Hani Hanjour was not allowed to rent a Cessna 172 due to his poor piloting skills).
14. Official narrative contradicts experience (personal or historical) (E.g., that no high-rise building in history has ever collapsed due to fire damage, yet it supposedly happened three times at the same place on the same day.)
15. No surviving witnesses) (problematic witness or patsy gets killed, drugged, or “suicided.”)
16. There is no obvious motive for the attack.
17. Family or witnesses in the event have elite or acting backgrounds
18. Fake “victims;” the same “victim” get killed in two or more separate events.
19. The same witnesses are present at two or more events. (Link)
21. “Witnesses” make official talking points. (E.g., 9/11 “Harley guy” claiming that WTC 1 & 2 collapsed “mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense.”)
22. “Witnesses” speak in “officialese” (e.g., “multiple gunshots” instead of “several (or a specific number of) gunshots,” or, “I witnessed…,” instead of, “I saw…”)
23. Non sequiturs (e.g. that victims’ families wouldn’t want to know how their loved ones died; or pulling out of an illegal war would be disrespectful of “the troops;” or that “an investigation of a terrorist act would invite another such offense.”)
24. “Witnesses” speak in generalities, so as to avoid the risk of telling too different a story as other “witnesses.”
25. Witnesses’ statements are reinterpreted or shut off by an interviewer.
26. Shooters always have new social media accounts.
27. Shooter leaves a manifesto.
28. Even before there is time for investigation, the “news” media has quickly and conveniently named and demonized the “culprit” (read: patsy).
29. Patsy has had no military training, yet he shoots extremely fast and accurately.
30. The suspect(s) have a demonstrable connection to the CIA, FBI, or another intelligence agency.
31. The suspect has no credible means of funding. (e.g., James Holmes, an unemployed medical student who had $26,000 worth of armaments, body armor, bomb-making equipment, and other paraphernalia. Unaccountably, he also had the skills to make the bombs, rig the booby traps, and use the guns and ammo. Wow!)
32. Victim’s families don’t sue anyone for negligence, but receive millions in unsolicited federal payouts
33. The officially proposed solution wouldn’t have prevented the events.
34. The official narrative keeps changing.
35. At or near the same time and place as the event, officials are conducting drills simulating an event that’s virtually identical to the “real” event that is taking place.
36. Cui Bono? (Who benefits?)
37. Key questions are never investigated and are left unanswered.
38. The case is quickly closed
39. Key evidence is conveniently destroyed before a thorough investigation can take place.
40. Clues in pop media (foreshadowing) (Use your favorite web or video search engine to find “predictive programming.”)
41. Eyewitnesses have accounts conflicting with official narrative) and are ignored
42. Credible reports of accomplices (e.g., “John Doe Number Two”) are ignored or quickly covered up.
43. Reporter or other authoritative accounts contradict official narrative (e.g. McIntyre’s (McIntyre’sfirst version) (McIntyre’s flipflop) and Walter’s flip flops; or FBI crime stats revealing that no murders were committed in or around Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, the year of the alleged Sandy Hook shooting).
44. Official behavior contradicts official narrative (e.g. outbound flights arranged for the bin Laden family while bin Laden was being blamed for an atrocity, even as all other flights are grounded).
45. Terrorist PR is clearly designed for domestic consumption (e.g., when organizational initials or other PR symbols are in English when one would reasonably expect them to be in the native language of the terrorist group. Note: the acronym ISIS stands for the English words Islamic State of Iraq and Syria).
46. Other anomalies, which may or may not be found in more than one psyop event. “Other anomalies” can cover a wide range and be very difficult to spot or may be nothing more than anomalies.
Well, that’s my list. Not everything is a conspiracy, but conspiracies do happen. Politics, by its very nature, is conspiratorial.
“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” —Thomas Jefferson
Posted by Paradigmaclast at 1:24 PM